HIGH COURT, KOTA KINABALU
A JUVENILE – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
JUDGMENT
IanChin J:
Two juveniles were charged with the theft of a motor vehicle, an offence under s. 379A of the Penal Code and they both pleaded guilty. A probation report was tendered and the two advisers were of the view that both the juveniles should be sent to the Henry Gurney School for a period of three years. On 17 April 2001, the magistrate made an order of detention for three years. The present appeal is by the second juvenile who has no parents and his known relative could not afford to come to Kota Kinabalu from Sandakan. A stay of the order was only granted on 3 January 2002 after he had served the detention order for about seven months already. He has since obtained the service of an advocate to argue his appeal against the detention order.
The first ground of appeal was that, the magistrate of the first class has no jurisdiction over the matter as only a Sessions Court judge can sit in a Juvenile Court in view of s. 111 of the Subordinate Courts Act 1948 which provided the substitution of any reference in any written law passed before 1 June 1981 to a magistrate of the first class with a President of a Sessions Court and that consequently only a Sessions Court judge ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.