SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 865

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK, KUCHING
PP – Appellant
Versus
SIM ODITA MUHAMMAD ARCHITECTS SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Hamid Sultan Abu Backer JC:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the prosecution's appeal against the learned sessions judge who acquitted and discharged the respondents who were charged with four charges under s. 41(1)(d) of the Copyright Act 1987 (CA 1987) , on the charge inter alia that the respondents had in their possession infringing copies of computer programs during the subsistence of copyright, otherwise than for its private and domestic use.

[2] The four charges read as follows:

Amended Pertuduhan Pertama

Bahawa kamu pada 11 Mei 1999, kira-kira jam 2.50 petang, di premis SIM, ODITA, MUHAMMAD ARCHITECTS SDN. BHD., Lot No. 5684, Section 64, KTLD, Three Hill Parks, Kuching di dalam Daerah Kuching, di dalam Negeri Sarawak, tatkala hakcipta ujud di dalam karya sastera, kamu ada memiliki bagi apa-apa kegunaan selain daripada kegunaan domestic, salinan-salinan karya sastera dalam bentuk program komputer bertajuk AutoCAD 12 for Dos didalam 'Central Processing Unit' seperti berikut:

1) 'Central Processing Unit' Serial No. P 062711 yang dijumpai di Tingkat Dua;

2) 'Central Processing Unit' Serial No. P 364750 yang dijumpai di Tingkat Dua;

3) 'Central Processing Unit' Serial No. P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top