SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 1724

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHEN YING – Appellant
Versus
EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeal against refusal for stay. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. sufficiency of reason for bankruptcy stays. (Para 4 , 11 , 35)
3. distinction between legal tests for stay. (Para 9 , 17 , 32)
4. court's reasoning on jurisdiction and obligations. (Para 12 , 20 , 34)
Mary Lim Thiam Suan JCA:

[1] This was an appeal against a refusal to exercise discretion and grant a stay of execution. The learned High Court Judge did not find the circumstances presented as special warranting an exercise of discretion in the appellant's favour We unanimously found that exercise to be erroneous and we accordingly intervened to allow the appeal. These are the full reasons for our decision.

Relevant Facts

[2] The respondent granted a principal aggregate sum of USD 70 million term loan facility under the Overseas Project Financing ("facility") to a company known as Shenyang Shenyang Amusement Park Co Ltd ("borrower"). The facility was to part finance the development, construction and completion of an amusement park and a commercial complex known as "Magic Goat Paradise" in Shenyang, China ("project"). The project was being undertaken by the borrower on leasehold lands No 05208002 (TXGY (2005) No 17) (1137

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top