SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2290

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BANDAR UTAMA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
BANDAR UTAMA 1 JMB – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Max Yong,S Malar ,Respondent Advocate: Alvin Julian,Munawwir

[1] The appellants appealed against the decision of the learned High Court Judge who had allowed the respondent's application for pre-action discovery pursuant to O 24 r 7A of the Rules of 2012 ( ROC 2012).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top