NG CHIN CHAI vs PENTADBIR TANAH SEGAMAT & OTHER APPEALS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 MarsdenLR 599

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NG CHIN CHAI – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH SEGAMAT & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent

Table of Content
1. facts of land acquisition and compensation award. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
2. arguments regarding appealability of compensation award. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)
3. court observations on valuation methods and legal provisions. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46)
4. judgment on appeal's merits relating to compensation. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52)
5. final ruling and decision on the appeals. (Para 54 , 55)

Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin JCA:

Introduction

[1] These four appeals arose out of the decision of the learned High Court Judge in respect of Land Reference No: 15NCVC-23-11-2012 (Appeal J-01 (NCVC)(A)-155-04-2013) in which he had awarded the appellant therein (Ng Chin Chai) additional compensation of RM76,812.00 for the acquisition of Lot 333, Grant No 1839, Mukim Sungai Segamat, Daerah Segamat, Johor. The learned judge, with the agreement of all parties, had used this case as a "test case" whereby the decision in the said case would bind the other three land reference cases, namely:-

(i) No 15NCVC-24-11-2012 (Appe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2016 MarsdenLR 599

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYANG CHIN CHAI – AppellantVersusPENTADBIR TANAH SEGAMAT & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NG CHIN CHAI – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH SEGAMAT & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent