SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 989

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MD HILMI MD NOOR & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
AZMAN AHMAD & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Zainur Zakaria,Reza Rahim ,Respondent Advocate: Vijaya Segaran

Table of Content
1. facts establishing fraudulent property transfer. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. issues surrounding identity and proof of ownership. (Para 10 , 11)
3. standard of proof in civil fraud cases. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. impact of forgery on title validity. (Para 28 , 29 , 32)
JUDGMENT

Abang Iskandar Abang Hashim JCA:

Background Facts Of The Case

[1] Md Hilmi Md Noor and Mohd Ghazali Md Noor ("the plaintiffs") are the administrators of the estate of one Md Noor Mohamed ("the deceased"). They had filed this suit, both in such capacity as well as in their own personal capacity.

[2] The deceased was the registered owner of a property known as Lot 534 held under GM186, Mukim 11, Daerah Barat Daya, Bayan Lepas, Pulau Pinang ("the land"). However, the proprietorship as appearing in the Land Office's records was registered in the name/description of Mohamed Noor Mohamed which spelling was different from Md Noor Mohamed.

[3] The original title deed was in the possession of the plaintiffs, who at all material times, paid the quit rent of the land.

[4] The deceased passed away on 18 June 1990.

[5] On 28 January 2010, after a search was conducted at the Land Office, the plaintiffs discovere

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top