SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 1054

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DEEPAK JAIKISHAN – Appellant
Versus
A SANTAMIL SELVI ALAU MALAY @ ANNA MALAY & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Muhammad Shafee Abdullah,Sarah Abishegam ,Respondent Advocate: Americk Sidhu

Table of Content
1. summarizes the procedural history and claim details. (Para 1)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal in allowing the appeal by the respondents against the decision of the High Court. The appellant in this case was the 8th defendant and the respondents were the plaintiffs before the High Court. For ease of reference, we shall refer the parties as they were in the High Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top