Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 3461

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DEEPAK JAIKISHAN – Appellant
Versus
A SANTAMIL SELVI ALAU MALAY @ ANNA MALAY & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-14-05-2016]

Petitioner Advocates:Muhammad Shafee Abdullah,Sarah Abishegam ,Respondent Advocate: Americk Sidhu

Adherence to procedural law is crucial; failure to file separate notices for distinct applications results in a miscarriage of justice, allowing the appeal.

Headnote:The Court examined the adherence to procedural rules under the Rules of the Court of Appeal 1994, specifically the necessity of filing separate notices of appeal for distinct interlocutory applications. It concluded that failing to do so constituted a substantial miscarriage of justice, thereby allowing the appeal. The Court emphasized the importance of compliance with procedural norms to prevent injustice in legal proceedings. Ultimately, the appeal was allowed.

Table of Content
1. summarizes the procedural history and claim details. (Para 1)

[1] This is an appeal by the appellant against the decision of the Court of Appeal in allowing the appeal by the respondents against the decision of the High Court. The appellant in this case was the 8th defendant and the respondents were the plaintiffs before the High Court. For ease of reference, we shall refer the parties as they were in the High Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2017 MarsdenLR 3461

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYADEEPAK JAIKISHAN – AppellantVersusA SANTAMIL SELVI ALAU MALAY @ ANNA MALAY & ORS – Respondent[Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-14-05-2016]

Adherence to procedural law is crucial; failure to file separate notices for distinct applications results in a miscarriage of justice, allowing the appeal.

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DEEPAK JAIKISHAN – Appellant
Versus
A SANTAMIL SELVI ALAU MALAY @ ANNA MALAY & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Appeal No: 01(f)-14-05-2016]