SPEKTRA SEGMEN SDN BHD vs TC AUTOWORLD SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPEAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Petitioner Advocates:,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. overview of appeals by spektra and tc auto. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background facts regarding land ownership and structures. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. details of the encroachment dispute and court orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
4. importance of the mandatory injunction in damage assessment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. spektra's arguments regarding non-compliance with orders. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 28 , 29 , 30)
6. court's evaluation of causal link and damages. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
7. expert testimony on setback requirements. (Para 36 , 37 , 39 , 40 , 41)
8. judicial notice of local council guidelines. (Para 44 , 45 , 47)
9. impact of compliance with setback on structural integrity. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54)
10. tc auto's claim for damages due to mandatory injunction. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59)
11. methodology for calculating damages. (Para 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64)
12. reliability of expert reports in damage assessment. (Para 66 , 67 , 68)
13. critique of opposing expert report. (Para 69 , 70 , 75)
14. deputy registrar's findings on structural integrity. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80)
15. assessment of loss and reconfiguration due to in