FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
TAN POH LEE – Appellant
Versus
TAN BOON THIEN – Respondent
Introduction
[1] Two questions of law arose for consideration before us in this appeal:
(a) Whether on a true construction of O 52 r 2B of the Rules of 2012, prior notice to show cause is to be given to a proposed contemnor before the filing of an ex parte leave application under O 52 r 3 of the Rules of 2012; and
(b) Whether on a true construction of O 52 r 2B of the Rules of 2012, the notice to show cause referred to in O 52 r 2B, means the documents referred to in O 52 r 4(3) of the Rules of 2012.
Background
[2] On 30 September 2019 the Court of Appeal set aside the motion to commence committal proceedings brought by the appellant against the respondent, for failure of the respondent to comply with a conditional stay order dated 21 February 2019. The condition imposed for the stay was that the status quo of the assets relating to a pending probate action were to be preserved. There was an alleged contravention of that condition by the respondent.
The Decision Of The Court Of Appeal
[3] The sole ground on which the Court of Appeal set aside the leave previously granted, was that the appellant failed to issue a Notice to Show Cause seemingly mandatory
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.