SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 3736

HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
MOHAMMAD MUBDE ABSI & ORS – Appellant
Versus
HYAT COLLECTIONS SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
[Civil Suit No: WA-22IP-15-04-2017]



Petitioner Advocates:Steven Cheok Hou Cher,Ng Kim Poh,Nicole Alexandra Chong Zhi Wan ,Respondent Advocate: Mohd Aimi Zaini Mohd Azhar,Zainuritha-Alfa Abu Hassan

The court establishes that an invention can be patentable even in the fashion industry if it meets statutory criteria under the Patents Act.

Headnote:This judgment analyzes the patentability of a ready-to-wear and pinless hijab under the Patents Act 1983 (PA). The court finds that the invention satisfies the criteria of being a novel, inventive step, and industrially applicable under ss 11, 12(1), and 16 PA. The counterclaim for invalidation is dismissed, and the defendants are found to have infringed the patent privileges. Final ruling: "the original action is allowed with costs."

Table of Content
1. is the hijab patentable under the patents act 1983? (Para 1 , 2 , 5 , 6)
2. patentability of hijabs under the law. (Para 7)
3. infringement analysis regarding defendants. (Para 8)
Wong Kian Kheong J:

(After trial)

A. Background

[1] This case raises a novel question of whether an instant (ready-to-wear and pinless) "hijab" (headscarf) is patentable under Patents Act 1983 ( PA ).

[2] The four plaintiffs (plaintiffs) are co-owners of Patent No MY-153705-A (Patent 705).

[3] The 1st defendant company (1st defendant) is a Malaysian company in the business of, among others, import and export of textiles. The 2nd and 3rd defendants are the directors and shareholders of the 1st defendant.

[4] The 2nd defendant is the 3rd defendant's husband. The 2nd defendant is a sole proprietor of a business, "Idaman Trading" (Idaman), which, among others, distributes and sells clothes and textiles.

[5] This action, filed by the plaintiffs, alleges that the defendants have infringed Patent 705 (Original Action) by distributing and selling Hyat hijabs product (Hyat Hijabs). The defendants have counterclaimed to invalidate Patent 705 (Counterclaim).

B. Issues

[6] The following questions are to be decided in this case:

(1) regarding Patent 705, who is the notional person ordinarily skilled in the art (POSITA)?;

(2) whether Patent 705 can be invalidated on any one or more of the following grounds:

(a) is the plaintiffs' ready-to-wear and pinless hijab (Bokitta Hijab) an "invention" under s 12(1) PA ?;

(b) whether Bokitta Hijab is "new" within the meaning of s 14(1) PA ;

(c) does Bokitta Hijab involve an "inventive step" as understood in s 15(1) PA ?; and

(d) whether Patent 705 has complied with s 23 PA read with regs 12(1)(c), (f) and 13(1) of the Patents Regulations 1986 (PR); and

(3) if Patent 705 is valid, whether the defendants' sales of Hyat Hijabs have infringed Patent 705 under ss 36(1)(a), (2), (3)(a)(i) and 58 PA .

C. Patent 705

[7] The five "Claims" in Patent 705 (5 Claims) provide as follows:

"CLAIMS

1. A ready-to-wear headscarf (100) consisting of a garment element (101) made out of a pieces of fabric material, the garment element (101) comprising: a head portion that covers a user's head, the head portion having a first side, a second side, a top section, a front side and a back side, the head portion containing a face opening at the front side, a neck portion encircling a user's neck, a neck opening located at the bottom of the neck portion, the neck opening is larger in size than the face opening; a series of stitched seams comprising a front seam, a back seam, and a central seam, the front seam extending along the front side of the head portion from a first end at a bottom of the face opening and intersecting a periphery of the face opening continuing upwardly along the first side to the top section of the head portion and then downwardly to an upper region of the second side of the head portion, the front seam is offset from the face opening periphery as it extends from the first side to the top section along to the second side, the central seam extends from the front seam at the second side across the upper region of the head portion to the back side of the head portion, the back seam extends from the central seam diagonally from the back side at the top section to the a lower portion of the back side adjacent to the neck portion; and the series of stitched seams form the garment element from a planar layer of fabric to the headscarf with overlapping fabric regions adjacent the series of stitched seams (Claim 1).

2. The headscarf according to Claim 1 wherein said garment element is comprised of one or plurality of panels sewed to create the said garment element (Claim 2).

3. The headscarf according to Claim 1 wherein the garment element is an ordinary scarf (Claim 3).

4. The headscarf according to Claim 1 wherein the garment element is a custom cut scarf (Claim 4).

5. The headscarf according to Claim 1 combined with a styling acce

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top