HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
RHB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
SINGLEFINE (M) SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff bank filed a claim under a restructuring agreement. (Para 1 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. establishing a plaintiff's claim based on a restructuring agreement and personal guarantees. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 7) |
[1] The plaintiff, RHB Bank Berhad (the "bank"), sued the 1st defendant, Singlefine (M) Sdn Bhd (the "borrower"), under a Restructuring Agreement entered into between them pursuant to a consent judgment. The 2nd and 3rd defendants were guarantors of Singlefine's obligations to the bank (although on a true construction of the Personal Guarantee executed by them, they had agreed to be liable as principal debtors and not merely as surety).
Material Background Facts
[2] The borrower was a subcontractor that had been awarded, in December 2005, a contract to undertake electrical works in connection with the construction of a building owned by Bank Negara, known as Sasana Kijang. The contract was awarded to the borrower by the main contractor, H&I Niaga Sdn Bhd.
[3] On 8 January 2007, the borrower entered into a Facilities Agreement with the bank. The Facilities Agreement was secured by, among others, the Personal Guarantee executed by the 2nd and 3rd defendants and a Deed of Assign
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.