SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 MarsdenLR 1648

WAN ADNAN
PEDLEY – Appellant
Versus
MAJLIS UGAMA ISLAM PULAU PINANG – Respondent


Advocates:
Karpal Singh for the plaintiff.
V Thevendran for the first defendant.
Hashim bin Dato Haji Yusoff (Legal Adviser, Penang) for the second defendant.

JUDGMENTBY: WAN ADNAN J

By this application, the plaintiff is asking for the following declaration:

(1) That the conversion of the plaintiffs wife Olwen Patricia Pedley

nee Newman [commat] Mahani Newman bte Abdullah to Islam on 12

January 1987 has not determined his marriage to her according to

Catholic rites on 12 February 1966.

(2) That the continued living together of the plaintiff and his wife,

Olwen Patricia Pedley nee Newman [commat] Mahani Newman bte

Abdullah is lawful.

The plaintiff married one Olwen Patricia Pedley nee Newman at the Cathedral of the Assumption, Farquhar St, Penang on 12 February 1966. Both them were practising Roman Catholics. On 12 January 1987, the said Olwen Patricia Pedley embraced the religion of Islam without the plaintiffs knowledge and consent at the Jabatan Hal Ehwal Ugama, Lebuh Downing, Pulau Pinang and assumed the name of Mahani Newman bte Abdullah.

On 10 April 1987, the Kadi Besar of Negeri Pulau Pinang, Haji Fathil bin Haji Abdullah, wrote to the plaintiff as follows:

Dimaklumkan berhubung dengan perkara yang di atas, bahawa isteri tuan

yang bernama Olive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top