SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2298

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MALAYSIA AIRLINE SYSTEM BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
WAN SAADI WAN MUSTAFA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:P Tharaselvi Pararajasingam ,Respondent Advocate: Indran Kumaraguru

[1] On 18 November 2013 the Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal by the appellant against the decision of the High Court made on 28 April 2010.

[2] The High Court had allowed the judicial review application by the respondent and caused to be issued an Order of certiorari to quash the Award made by the Industrial Court on 7 July 2008. The Industrial Court had dismissed the claim by the respondent for unjust dismissal. The High Court had also ordered that the matter be remitted to the Industrial Court for rehearing before another chairman.

[3] The appellant was dissatisfied with the decision of the Court of Appeal and sought for leave to appeal to this Court. On 25 March 2013 leave was granted on this sole question:

'Whether there has been a denial of substantive fairness and/or a denial of procedural fairness when an Industrial Court, which hears a representation of dismissal without just cause or excuse under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 and allows part of the proceedings, ie cross-examination of the complainant to be heard "incamera", without the presence of the dismissed employee, but in the presence of his counsel, who had ample opportunity to and did crossexamine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top