SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 678

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
WONG WEE KHEONG & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
DAYA BERSAMA SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appeals related to a company's liquidation (Para 1 , 2)
2. background facts of the company liquidation (Para 3)
3. high court proceedings regarding land recovery (Para 4 , 5)
4. court of appeal's overview on disposals by liquidated companies (Para 6 , 7 , 11)
5. arguments regarding void transfers post-winding up (Para 8 , 9)
6. indefeasibility of title for bona fide purchasers (Para 10 , 15)
7. court's discretion in validating transactions (Para 12 , 14 , 20)
8. discretionary power to validate transactions. (Para 13)
9. effectiveness of bona fide purchasers' claims. (Para 17 , 19)
10. discussions on allegations of fraud and authenticity (Para 21 , 22)
11. conclusion and cost awards for appellants (Para 23 , 24)

[1] There are four appeals before this court. They are in respect of the four related appeals by the appellants against the order of the court of Appeal dated 2 July 2010 based on common issues. For the purpose of the argument of the said four appeals before us the parties have agreed to refer to the record of appeal filed under Civil Appeal No 02(f)-64-10-2011(W) and the decision in Appeal No 02(f)-64-10-2011(W) binds the parties in respect of the remaining three ot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top