SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 2075

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
SYARIFUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. charge of drug trafficking including details of the case. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3)
2. appellant's defence claims package not found on him. (Para 4)
3. examination of evidence and credibility considerations. (Para 5)

[1] Syarifuddin (the appellant) was charged in the High Court at Shah Alam for trafficking in dangerous drugs, that is to say, cannabis weighing 415g under s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 (the Act). The charge reads as follows:

"Bahawa kamu pada 9 Julai 2003, jam lebih kurang 2. 00 petang, di kawasan pembinaan rumah Desa Pinggiran Putra Kampung Limau Manis, Dengkil, dalam Daerah Sepang, dalam Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan, telah memperedarkan dadah berbahaya iaitu 415 gram Cannabis dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan suatu kesalahan di bawah s 39B(1)(a) Akta Dadah Berbahaya 1952 yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 39B(2) Akta yang sama. "

[2] In brief, the case for the prosecution is this. On 9 July 2003, at about 10. 00 am, acting on information received, ASP Azizan bin Said (PW1) and a team of police personnel proceeded to Desa Pinggiran Putra, Kampung Sungai Manis, Dengkil to lay an ambush at a construction site. Upon arrival at the scene, PW1 i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top