SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 1871

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LITUS JAU & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
BOUSTEAD PELITA TINJAR SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. native customary rights (ncr) claims ownership dispute (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
2. procedural approach to challenging public authority decisions (Para 8)

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge sitting at Miri, given on 31 May 2012, in striking out the appellants' suit under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980 ("RHC").

[2] The appellants' suit was struck out on two grounds. Firstly, for using the wrong mode of proceedings. Secondly, the suit was barred by limitation under s 2(a) of the Public Authorities Protection Act 1948 ("PAPA") and Sarawak Limitation Ordinance (Chap 49) (" SLO ").

[3] The appellants are the plaintiffs and the respondents are the defendants. For convenience parties are to be referred to as in the High Court.

Background Facts

[4] The relevant background facts are these. The plaintiffs are Berawan by race and natives of Sarawak. They claimed that they had acquired Natives Customary Rights ("NCR") over three parcels of land which were shown in a map marked "M" annexed in the statement of claim ("NCR Land"). It was the plaintiffs' case that the NCR Land was owned and occupied by their grandparents in accordance with their

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top