SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 1094

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CAS – Appellant
Versus
MPPL & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Honey Tan Lay Ean ,Respondent Advocate: YN Foo,Kiran Dhaliwall

Table of Content
1. importance of determining paternity for child c. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. the appeal concerns the welfare of a child regarding paternity. (Para 7)
3. plaintiff's amended os focused on establishing paternity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. conclusion to remit to high court for determination. (Para 13)
5. high court's reasoning linked paternity and legitimacy. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
6. arguments regarding the implications of legitimacy on paternity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
7. legal distinction between legitimacy and paternity. (Para 22)
Salient Facts

[3] The 1st defendant is a female who is an Air Stewardess/Flight Attendant. The 2nd defendant is a pilot and the 1st defendant's husband. The defendants married on 3 March 2007. On 23 June 2008, the 1st defendant gave birth to her daughter who will be referred to in this judgment as Child C. Child C thus was born into a valid marriage between the defendants.

[4] The plaintiff is a male and also makes his living as a pilot. He works in the same airline as the 1st defendant but different from that of the 2nd defendant. We consider it significant to highlight that all the parties concerned in this suit are non-Muslims.

[5] It is the plaintiff's c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top