COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CAS – Appellant
Versus
MPPL & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of determining paternity for child c. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. the appeal concerns the welfare of a child regarding paternity. (Para 7) |
| 3. plaintiff's amended os focused on establishing paternity. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. conclusion to remit to high court for determination. (Para 13) |
| 5. high court's reasoning linked paternity and legitimacy. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. arguments regarding the implications of legitimacy on paternity. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. legal distinction between legitimacy and paternity. (Para 22) |
[3] The 1st defendant is a female who is an Air Stewardess/Flight Attendant. The 2nd defendant is a pilot and the 1st defendant's husband. The defendants married on 3 March 2007. On 23 June 2008, the 1st defendant gave birth to her daughter who will be referred to in this judgment as Child C. Child C thus was born into a valid marriage between the defendants.
[4] The plaintiff is a male and also makes his living as a pilot. He works in the same airline as the 1st defendant but different from that of the 2nd defendant. We consider it significant to highlight that all the parties concerned in this suit are non-Muslims.
[5] It is the plaintiff's c
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.