Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
HUAT HING RUBBERWOOD SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GOODNITE SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clarification of contractual nature in business transactions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of the companies involved. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 3. plaintiff's claims regarding the friendly loan. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 4. defendant's contentions against a contractual agreement. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 5. witness testimonies supporting both parties' claims. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 6. court's observations on evidence provided by the plaintiff. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 7. importance of documentation in commercial dealings. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 8. issues regarding the absence of written loan agreements. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 9. need for formal demands in commercial financing. (Para 63 , 64 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70) |
| 10. adverse inference draw for not calling significant witnesses. (Para 157 , 158 , 159 , 160) |
| 11. conclusion on the enforceability of the claimed loan. (Para 168 , 169) |
[1] This judgment concerns a claim arising from the murky waters where friendship meets commerce, and where the absence of proper documentation can transform what appears
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
