INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
DON CLAUDINE PEREIRA – Appellant
Versus
OIB MARKETING SDN BHD – Respondent
Parties and Background
- Claimant (Don Claudine Pereira) employed as Business Development Executive, transferred to Respondent (OIB Marketing Sdn Bhd) effective 1 November 2019. (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Dismissed on 14 February 2020 for serious misconduct: repeated absenteeism without applying for leave and late submission of sick leave applications. (!) (!) (!) (!)
Procedural History
- Show Cause Letter dated 11 February 2020 requiring explanation by 14 February 2020, 5:30 pm. (!) (!) (!)
- Claimant suspended 12 February 2020; replied late at 5:36 pm on 14 February 2020. (!) (!)
- Termination letter same day: explanations unsatisfactory, one month's salary in lieu of notice. (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Reference under s.20(3) Industrial Relations Act 1967 by Minister of Human Resources. (!) (!)
Allegations of Misconduct
- Repeated absences without leave: 4 December 2019 (late arrival), 20 December 2019, 15 January 2020. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Late sick leave applications via Kakitangan.com: 7 January 2020 (7 days late), 8 January 2020 (7 days late), 10 January 2020 (5 days late). (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Claimant admitted absences but claimed no need to apply for sick/emergency leave; challenged sick leave timeframe. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Evidence and Findings
- Company proved misconduct on balance of probabilities via witness testimony, WhatsApp records showing admissions and late notifications. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Lateness treated as absence without leave; duty to apply for all leaves (sick/emergency) promptly via system, even post-absence with MC. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Absences disrupted productivity, required staff redistribution. (!) (!) (!) (!)
- Warning letter (7 February 2020) refused by Claimant who requested show cause first; not tendered as withdrawn. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
Court's Role and Standard
- Industrial Court determines: (1) if misconduct proven, (2) if it justifies dismissal. Burden on employer (balance of probabilities). (!) (!)
- Only reasons in show cause/termination considered, not additional records. (!) (!) (!)
Procedural Issues
- Disputes over show cause delivery (bullying alleged) and HR suggestion to resign irrelevant; no force to admit/resign. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
- No domestic inquiry held post-reply, but not fatal if just cause proven in court. (!) (!) (!) (!)
Decision
- Misconduct established; failure to apply/notify for leaves = just cause for dismissal. (!) (!)
- Claim dismissed. (!)
AWARD
A. Reference
[1] This is a reference from The Honourable Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the IRA ") in respect of the dismissal of Don Claudine Pereira ("the Claimant") by her employer, OIB Marketing Sdn Bhd ("the Company") on 14 February 2020.
B. Background
[2] This case was initially tried by me as the Chairman of Court 11, Industrial Court of Malaysia. I ceased to be the Chairman of Court 11, effective 16 January 2023. I have been requested to continue with the hearing of this case after I was re-appointed as the new Chairman of Court 15, effective 1 June 2023.
C. The Proceedings
[3] The Claimant in our present case was dismissed by the Company for alleged serious misconduct. The Company claimed that the Claimant had repeatedly been absent from work without applying for leave and was consistently late in submitting sick leave applications.
[4] The case was first called up for hearing on 23 November 2022. The Company commenced the case by calling the following persons as witnesses to give evidence in support of the Company's case against the Claimant:
(
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.