HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
DANAHARTA MANAGERS SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
MELEWAR LEISURE SDN BHD & 2 ORS – Respondent
GROUNDS OF DECISION
The application by the plaintiff in enclosure 25 was made under O 14A of the Rules of the High , 1980 (RHC). Essentially enclosure 25 requires the Court to determine the validity of the agreements between parties for want of consideration; the validity of the interest charges; and the conclusiveness of the Certificate of Indebtedness. Upon the determination of all these issues in favour of the plaintiff the Court may enter judgments against all the defendants upon the terms stated in the said enclosure 25.
Brief facts
1. Sime Bank Bhd (SBB) granted four loan facilities to four companies namely; BistroAmericana (M) Sdn. Bhd (BAM), BistroAmericana (PJ) Sdn. Bhd (BAPJ), BistroAmericana (SJ) Sdn. Bhd. (BASJ) and BistroAmericana (JB) Sdn Bhd (BAJB). All these four borrowers shall hereafter be referred to collectively as the "Initial Borrowers".
2. All the four loan facilities were secured by a corporate guarantee of Melewar Leisure Sdn Bhd (the first defendant) and the personal guarantees each by Tunku Abdullah Ibni Almarhum Tunku Abdul Rahman (the second defendant) and Tunku Iskandar bin Tunku Abdullah (the third defendant)The Initial Borrowers defaulted in thei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.