SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 MarsdenLR 4198 ; 2009 MarsdenLR 1

SURIYADI HALIM OMAR, WAN ADNAN MUHAMAD, HISHAMUDIN MOHD YUNUS
AZHAR CHE WIL – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suriyadi Halim Omar JCA:

[1] These two appeals, C-05-27-06 and C-05-94-05, are connected. They originated from criminal trial No. 45(46)-3-2004, where seven persons were charged for murder under s. 302 of the Penal Code read together with s. 35 of the same Code. All the accused persons in the above case are prison officers and personnel from Penjara Penor, Kuantan.

[2] At the trial, before the commencement of the submissions but still at the prosecution's stage, the learned Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) conceded that no prima facie case had been established against the sixth accused person, whereupon he was acquitted and discharged. At the close of the prosecution's case, after hearing the submissions of accused persons 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7, the court only called the first accused person to enter his defence, and acquitted accused persons 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7. At close of the defence case the learned trial judge found that the first accused person had failed to cast any reasonable doubt on the prosecution's case and therefore found him guilty. He was accordingly convicted of the charge of murder and sentenced to death.

[3] Pursuant to the order of acquittal of accused persons

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top