SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1954 MarsdenLR 246

HIGH COURT, SINGAPORE
SOON QUEK HOE & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
REGINA – Respondent
[Magistrate



JUDGMENT

Murray-Aynsley CJ:

This was a charge under s. 4 of Ordinance 37 of 1939 of "being a suspected person" loitering, etc.There are two elements in these cases: that of being a "suspected person" and "loitering etc." The two elements are distinct and the mere fact of loitering does not make the loiterer a suspected person; see Ledwith v. Roberts [1937] 1 KB 232.Here there was nothing to make the appellants suspected persons other than the facts which were the immediate cause of the arrests.

Appeal allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top