SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 3982 ; 2008 MarsdenLR 1

ZULKEFLI MAKINUDIN, SURIYADI HALIM OMAR, HELILIAH MOHD YUSOF
NGU CHU CHIONG – Appellant
Versus
LINA SOO – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Zulkefli Makinudin JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the first respondent against the decision of the learned judge of the High Court at Kuching in allowing the petitioner's application ("the application") filed by way of summon-in-chambers under s. 83 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 ("the Act") for a variation of the maintenance order made on 14 June 1989. In support of the application, the affidavit affirmed on 2 November 1998 by the petitioner stated that there had been material changes in the circumstances affecting the child of the marriage, namely Emily Jasmine Ngu Beixe, and the life of the petitioner over the past ten years. Emily was then fifteen years old and her needs have increased, and given the high cost of living today, the petitioner had requested that the maintenance be doubled from RM1,500 per month to RM3,000 per month.

Background Facts

[2] The relevant background facts of the case leading to the filing of the application are as follows:

(1) On 17 December 1987, the petitioner filed a Divorce Petition No. KG 61 of 1987 in the High Court (I) at Kuching, praying for inter alia, judicial separation, division of property and a mont

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top