SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 MarsdenLR 862

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
EDMUND CHARLES LIEBENBERG – Appellant
Versus
ICB-GRIFFIN MANUFACTURING SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Kang Hwee Gee J:

The Petitions

The two petitions, D4-26-2-1998 and D5-26-3-1998 were consolidated.

They were based on similar complaints and were for similar relief under s. 181 of the Companies Act 1965 .

The petition D4-2-1998 was directed to the directors of ICB-Griffin Manufacturing Sdn Bhd the 1st respondent; and the petition in D5-26-3-1998 to the directors of ICB-Griffin Marketing Sdn Bhd (the 1st respondent).

The directors of ICB-Griffin Manufacturing Sdn Bhd were also the directors of ICB-Griffin Marketing Sdn Bhd.

The complaints in the respective petition were in respect of the same acts of oppression by the common directors of the two related companies ICB-Griffin Manufacturing Sdn Bhd (the 1st respondent in D4-26-2-1998) and ICB-Griffin Marketing Sdn Bhd (1st respondent in D5-26-3-1998) which the petitioner claimed were committed against him at the behest of the directors of Instantgreen Corporation Bhd (the 2nd respondent) and ICB-Machineries Sdn Bhd (the 3rd respondent).

The earlier part of the proceedings was conducted before His Lordship Steve Shim J (as he then was before his elevation as Chief Justice East Malaysia), before whom the parties had agreed from the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top