SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 MarsdenLR 360

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
JOHN ANG & JEGA – Appellant
Versus
KULASINGAM SINATAMBY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Abdul Malik Ishak J:

Enclosure 2 - The Petitioner's Petition And The Objection

This was an application by the petitioner for the taxation of costs between solicitor and client under s 126 of the Legal Profession Act 1976 ("Act"). The legal work that was involved was carried out during a period of time stretching from November 1992 to March 1993 and the client was none other than the respondent. The petitioner is a well known law firm in Johor

Bahru and it goes by the name and in the style of M/s John Ang & Jega, and it is that law firm that is now entitled to the costs. The solicitor who undertook the legal work is a hardworking and upright individual by the name of Mr S Gunasegaran ("Mr Guna") and at the material time he was practicing as a sole proprietor in the name and style of M/s Guna & Co To consolidate his legal practice, Mr Guna decided to join M/s John Ang & Jega as a partner and this took effect on 12 April 1993. With effect from that date M/s Guna & Co merged with M/s John Ang & Jega and with that merger the petitioner became entitled to the costs as claimed in encl 2.

By way of encl 2, the petitioner prayed that:

(i) the said Bill of Costs may be taxed by this Honou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top