SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 1347

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
AMBANK (M) BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
NEW CENTURY CONCEPTS SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. counterclaim inclusion after judgment (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. court's discretion on counterclaims and relevant case law (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. dismissal of defendant's application (Para 8)
Hamid Sultan Abu Backer J:

[1] This is my judgment in respect of the defendant's application (enclosure 19) to amend the defence to include a counterclaim when the plaintiff has already obtained a summary judgment and is in the process of executing the judgment.

[2] The central issue in this case is whether or not the defendants are permitted to include a counterclaim when the main suit has been duly disposed off and a judgment has been given by the court pursuant to rules of court.

Brief Facts

[3] In the instant case the plaintiff has already obtained summary judgment and in the process of enforcing the judgment by way of garnishee and bankruptcy proceedings. In an unusual manner the defendants have made this application to include a counterclaim. The plaintiff objects vehemently on the following grounds, namely: (i) the present suit is no longer extant; (ii) the defendants' proposed cause of action in the counterclaim is fundamentally different from the plaintiffs claim; and (iii) in a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top