SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 1233

HIGH COURT MALAYA JOHOR BAHRU
MOHD NASIR MOIDU – Appellant
Versus
LEE SWEE KIM – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's ownership and claim of forgery. (Para 1 , 2)
2. defendant's assertions of legal sale and documentation. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
Vernon Ong Lam Kiat J:

Mohd. Nasir Bin Moidu ('the plaintiff') was the registered owner of a piece of land. The plaintiff is seeking a declaration that the transfer of the land to Lee Swee Kim ('the defendant') is null and void because his signatures on the transfer documentation were forged.

Plaintiff's Case

The plaintiff was the registered owner of the land held under HS(M) 4755 Lot 1990 Mukim Tebrau Daerah Johor Bahru Negeri Johor ('the Land'). The plaintiff's case is that the defendant obtained the title to the Land through fraud and or fraudulent misrepresentation and or forgery. Sometime in February 1990 the plaintiff handed over the title deed to the Land at a lawyer's office to one Ah Heng as security for a loan of RM100,000.00 given to his brother in law one En. Abidin Bin Kadamun. Ah Heng agreed to hold the title deed in trust and to return it to the plaintiff after Abidin repaid the loan.

In 1993 the plaintiff received a notice from the Inland Revenue Department asking him to submit a real property gains tax form. After receipt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top