Back
MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA, JOHOR BAHRU
KUNASEGARAN MARIMUTHU LWN. PP
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. case initiated under firearm and robbery laws. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prosecution's eyewitness testimony and evidence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. defendant's denial of robbery and conflicting stories. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. defense arguments against prosecution's evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's analysis on evidence credibility. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. court's rejection of defense claims and theories. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. judgment reflects proper legal standards followed. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. legal understanding of double jeopardy principle. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 9. analysis of charge distinctions and their legal implications. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 30) |
| 10. final decision on convictions and sentencing. (Para 31 , 32) |
[1] Ini adalah rayuan perayu terhadap sabitan dan hukuman oleh Tuan Hakim Mahkamah Sesyen di Johor Bahru (Tuan HMS) pada 23 Oktober 2009 di bawah s. 6 Akta Senjata Api (Penalti Lebih Berat) 1971 dan di bawah s. 392 /397 Kanun Keseksaan . Perayu telah dijatuhkan dengan hukuman penjara enam tahun bagi kesalahan pertama dan lapan tahun bagi kesalahan kedua. Kedua-dua hukuman penjara diperintahkan berjalan serentak mulai dari tarikh ditangkap (16 Mei 2007).
[2] Dua pertuduhan t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
