SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1754

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
AGROVENUS LLP – Appellant
Versus
PACIFIC INTER-LINK SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


[1] At the commencement of the hearing of the appeal, the court was informed by the parties that they agree that the decision in Civil Appeal W-02(NCC)-177-01-2012 will apply to and binds the parties in Civil Appeal W-02(NCC)-176-01-2012.

Brief Background

[2] The parties had entered into a sale contract dated 3 April 2009 for the sale of Palm Olein and Palm Kernel Oil. The price of Palm Olein at USD849.75 per tonne and Palm Kernel Oil at USD820.50 per tonne included freight charges. The sale contract contained an Arbitration Agreement. The dispute submitted to the arbitration by the appellant and the respondent was whether, at a meeting on 10 April 2009 in Istanbul, the respondent Pacific Inter-Link Sdn Bhd as seller, had agreed orally to give the appellant a discount of USD30 per tonne in respect of adjustment of the freight component.

[3] The arbitration was conducted on documents only. The arbitral tribunal concluded that the respondent had orally agreed to give the discount of USD30 per tonne. On this basis, it awarded the sum of USD180,768.42 to the appellant.

[4] By an originating summons on 15 August 2011, the appellant Food Ingredients LLC had applied, pursuant to s 38 of the A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top