SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 MarsdenLR 1681

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
POEY YEE MENG & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TROPIKA ISTIMEWA DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Akhtar Tahir J:

Introduction

[1] The Court in this case used its discretion on its own motion to strike out the plaintiffs' claim for being in non-compliance with the Rules of 2012 ("the Rules").

The Plaintiffs' Statement Of Claim

[2] The plaintiffs' claim as reflected in the Statement of claim seems to be a representative action involving 133 plaintiffs. The first few pages of the Statement of Claim are devoted to introducing each plaintiff.

[3] Be that as it may, in para 15 the 1st defendant is introduced as a the developer of a project called "The Meridin @ Medini" ("the Project") on a land held under HS(D) 478932 PTD 170665, Mukim Pulai, Daerah Johor Bahru, Negeri Johor ("the said land") belonging to the 2nd defendant, a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act 1965.

[4] The 2nd defendant had leased the said land to Medini Land Sdn Bhd ("Medini Land") for a period of 99 years beginning from 15 April 2013 and ending on 14 April 2012 ("the said lease").

[5] The 3rd to the 13th defendants are banks and financial institutions.

[6] Medini land had entered into an agreement to sell the lease to the 1st defendant. Meanwhile the 1st defendant on purchasing the leas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top