SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 MarsdenLR 47

HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
PP – Appellant
Versus
LOO CHOON FATT – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Wan Abdul Majid Wan Hamid ,Respondent Advocate: Paramjit Singh

JUDGMENT

Hashim Yeop A Sani J (delivering oral judgment):

[1] The facts of the case are that on May 20, 1975 at about 11.20 am a Police constable, PC 58206, arrested the accused in Kampong Jawa, Ipoh, and from his person were recovered 13 plastic tubes containing 3 grammes of what was suspected to be heroin. The accused was released on bail the following day. The chemist's report tendered in the Sessions Court, Ipoh, on November 25, 1975 showed only 1.2 grammes of heroin contained in 13 plastic tubes. The Special President amended the original charge as to the amount of heroin although this is not reflected in the certified copy before the Court. The accused pleaded guilty to the offence. In his mitigation the accused stated that this was his first offence and that he was threatened that if he did not sell the drugs he would be assaulted. The accused was bound over under s 294 of the Criminal Procedure Code for one year in the sum of $750 with one surety. The accused's mother stood on surety.

[2] The only point raised by Mr Paramjit Singh worth considering is whether the Special President should have rejected the plea of guilty because the accused stated "that he would be assaulted" i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top