SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 MarsdenLR 68

WAN YAHYA
LOY CHIN HEI – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the applicant - F.H. D Cruz
For the respondent - C.W. Chan (DPP)

JUDGMENT

Wan Yahya J:

This is an application by a person accused of an offence under s. 6B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952, for bail pending disposal of the charge against him. He had been earlier produced before the President of the Sessions Court, Melaka on 15 April 1981 but he was denied bail by the learned President in view of s. 41B of the Act.

At the commencement of hearing before this Court his counsel, Mr. Hilary D'Cruz, with his usual precision, laid down two points for consideration of appeal, as follows:

(i) Whether s. 41B of the Dangerous Drugs Actwould make the offence non-bailable or preclude bail: and

(ii) In either of these two events whether the High Court is precluded from exercising its discretionary powers over bail.

Counsel first drew the subtle distinction between a non-bailable offence and an unbailable offence. He contends that non-bailable offences, as defined under "bailable offence" in s. 2 of the Criminal Procedure Codeinclude all offences, including those outside the Code, should be either bailable or unbailable offences. Following this reasoning, counsel argued, the offence under s. 6B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Ordinance would therefore fall u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top