LORD DIPLOCK, LORD SIMON OF GLAISDALE, LORD SALMON, LORD EDMUND DAVIES, LORD KEITH OF KINKEL
TEH CHENG POH – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent
Lord Diplock (delivering the judgment of the Board):
On 13 January 1976, in Georgetown, Penang, the appellant Teh Cheng Poh was found in possession of a revolver and ammunition. This happened in the course of a search by a police patrol which had been instituted as a result of an emergency phone call complaining of an armed robbery. The appellant was subsequently charged with two offences under s. 57(1) of the Internal Security Act. 1960. One was of having in his possession in a security area without lawful excuse a firearm without lawful authority therefor; the other charged a similar offence in respect of the ammunition. The mandatory penalty for these offences is death.
Penang, in common with all other areas in Malaysia, had been declared to be a security area for the purposes of Pt II of the Internal Security Act, by a Proclamation of HM the Yang di-Pertuan Agong made on 15 May 1969 ("the
Security Area Proclamation"). If this Proclamation were still effective on 13 January 1976 the offences with which the appellant was charged would constitute "security offences" within the meaning of the Essential (Security Cases) (Amendment) Regulations, 1975 ("the Security Cases R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.