COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
KOH SIAK POO – Appellant
Versus
SAYANG PLANTATION BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment favored the respondent's quasi-contractual claim for money. (Para 1 , 2 , 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 2. court upheld trial judge's findings based on evidence presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 11 , 30 , 39) |
| 3. importance of pleadings in shaping judicial outcomes. (Para 35 , 40) |
[1] This appeal has been brought against the decision of the High Court of Ipoh entering judgment for the respondent/plaintiff in the sum of RM663,000 and consequential relief. Judgment was also entered for the appellant/defendant on his counterclaim in the sum of RM100,640.99 together with interest and other ancillary relief. A cross appeal against judgment on the counterclaim has also been pursued before us.
[2] The main thrust of the appeal is directed against the judge's finding that the respondent had established a cause of action in the quasi-contractual claim for money had and received on the ground that there had been a total failure of consideration. In a carefully developed argument, Dato' Mahinder Singh has submitted that the statement of claim delivered by the respondent has failed to set out the essential ingredients to sustain an action for money had and receiv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.