Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA IPOH
ROSWAN ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITI PENDIDIKAN SULTAN IDRIS (UPSI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. financial obligations arise from educational sponsorship agreements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. failure to meet educational goals breached contractual terms. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's role is deference to trial judge's factual determinations. (Para 19 , 21 , 22) |
| 4. inference based on standard practice can establish contractual relation. (Para 24 , 28) |
| 5. consistent acceptance of payments indicates acknowledgment of obligations. (Para 36 , 37 , 40) |
| 6. affirmation of lower court's findings based on evidentiary review. (Para 46) |
Backgrounds Facts
[1] The Respondent, an institution of higher education, sued the Appellant, a former lecturer, to pay compensation in the amount of RM198,212.17.
[2] The Respondent operates under various legislative and regulatory frameworks, including the University Colleges Act 1971 and the Sultan Idris Education University (campus) Order 1997, which dictate its governance and policies.
[3] The Appellant, while being employed by the Respondent, embarked on a Doctor of Philosophy ("Ph.D.") program in Computer Networking at Universiti Putra Malaysia ("UPM"). This academic venture was undertaken through a scholarship scheme k
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
