SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 1458

INDUSTRIAL COURT PENANG
LEE GUAT YONG – Appellant
Versus
PST TRAVEL SERVICES SDN BHD – Respondent
Award No: 991 Of 2023 [Case No: 18/4-890/21]



Petitioner Advocates:Sahul Hamid Hussain ,Respondent Advocate: Leong Sher How

The termination of employment due to genuine redundancy amid economic downturn caused by the Covid-19 pandemic is lawful, provided the employer demonstrates bona fide reasons for such actions.

Headnote:The case under the Industrial Relations Act 1967 pertains to the dismissal of the claimant due to redundancy following the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on the tourism industry. Court's analysis reveals that the employer's claims of economic downturn and closure of its Penang branch are substantiated, leading to the conclusion that the redundancy was genuine and not done in bad faith or victimization. The claimant's dismissal is thus ruled as lawful. Verdict states: 'Hence the claimant's case is hereby dismissed.'

Table of Content
1. reference case pertaining to employee dismissal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. employer's grounds must be assessed for legitimacy. (Para 11 , 12 , 14)
3. job functions ceased due to corporate closure. (Para 13 , 30 , 31)
4. retrenchment laws and standards must be satisfied. (Para 64 , 66 , 82)
AWARD

Jeyaseelen T Anthony:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made on 17 March 2021 by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia to the Industrial Court of Malaysia under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ('the Act') arising out of the dismissal of Lee Guat Yong ('the claimant') by PST Travel Services Sdn Bhd ('the company') on 23 August 2020.

[2] The Ministerial reference in this case before the Court requires the Court to hear and determine the claimant's complaint of dismissal by the company on the 23 August 2020. Together with the claimant there are four (4) other claimants namely Tan Siew Siew (Case No 18/4-891/21), Lau Shao Ping (Case No 18/4-892/21), Lai Swee Kein (Case No 18/4-893/21) and Tan Jiun Ying (Case No 18/4-894/21) who had their employment terminated on grounds of redundancy. Hence at the request of both parties all five (5) ministerial references were heard together by this Court. This Court will hand down separate awards for each claimant as each claimant had given evidence separately as the facts differed from each other.

Brief Background Facts Of The Case

[3] The company's principle business is providing a whole range of travel services which includes air-ticketing, hotel reservations and tour bookings for inbound and out bound travels.

[4] The claimant's pleaded case as contained in her Statement of Case dated 28 July 2021, is that she joined the company as an Account Executive on the 6 August 2008 and was paid a salary of RM2,600.00 per month. Subsequently she was confirmed as Account Executive after the completion of the probation period and was based at the company's branch office in Penang. She continued to be in the same position until her termination from employment on the 23 August 2020 which took effect on 23 July 2020 (as the claimant was not required to work out her notice period). Her last drawn basic salary as pleaded was RM6,250.00 per month.

[5] The claimant was terminated from employment on the grounds of redundancy due to the Covid-19 pandemic. In her Statement of Case the claimant pleaded that due to the two Movement Control Orders (MCO's) announced by the government she was instructed to work from home by the company and for those staffs who were not working from home, the company had instructed them to take unpaid leave or annual leave (memos dated 17 March 2020 and 27 March 2020 COB-2 p 4-7). Further the claimant pleaded that the company through a memo dated 28 April 2020 (COB-2 p 8-12) had deducted her salary by 50% for the months of April and May 2020 without her consent.

[6] She claimed that the company by way of a memo dated 2 May 2020 (COB-2 p 14-16), instructed her to report for work at the company's branch office with effect from 4 May 2020 on rotation basis and by way of memo dated 25 June 2020 (COB-2 p 17-19) the company instructed her to come to work as normal, at a reduced salary of 50%.

[7] By way of memo dated 26 June 2020 (COB-2 p 20-23) the claimant pleaded that the company had announced a 35% salary cut for the month of June until December 2020 and requested her consent for the deduction. She claimed that one Ms Lilian Chung (COW-1) informed her that the company would only pay her June salary only on the condition that she accepts the said deduction. The claimant pleaded that she refused to accede to the request.

[8] There after the claimant pleaded that since almost all the staff at the Penang Branch had refused to consent to the 35% salary deduction, the company via email dated 10 July 2020 (COB-2 p 26) informed all the staff at the Penang Branch to report directly to the General Manager, Ms Cathy Lui. An email dated 14 July 2020 (CLB-1A p 1) was subsequently sen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top