FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DATUK HJ MOHAMMAD TUFAIL MAHMUD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
DATO TING CHECK SII – Respondent
Zaki Tun Azmi CJ:
Questions
[1] In light of the urgency of the matter, we gave our decision earlier. Here now are our reasons.
[2] The right to be heard is an integral part of the rules of natural justice. The right to be represented by counsel of one's choice is however conditional upon the laws regulating it. Such conditions are the subject matter of this judgment.
[3] The two questions posed before us were drafted as follows:-
(i) Whether an advocate and solicitor from Peninsular Malaysia is entitled to appear as counsel in an appeal to be heard in Putrajaya arising from a matter originating from the High Court in Sarawak and Sabah at Kuching?
(ii) Whether an advocate from Sarawak is entitled to appear as counsel in an appeal to be heard (by the Court of Appeal) in Putrajaya arising from a matter originating from the High Court in Sarawak and Sabah at Kuching?
(Words in parenthesis were added)
[4] The answers to the above questions would determine whether there exist any exclusive rights of the advocates and solicitors of Sabah and Sarawak to appear in Peninsular Malaysia and vice versa.
Facts Leading To The Questions
[5] Both appeals that came before us were not regarding the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.