SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 3285

HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
TETERIN ENGINEERING (M) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
TENTERA LAUT DIRAJA MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's total claim for goods delivered. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. details of goods claims and justification. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
3. issues regarding claims for the goods. (Para 10)
4. court's complete findings on the claims. (Para 11)
5. judicial reasoning and detailed observations. (Para 12)
6. rebuttals to defendant's arguments. (Para 13)
7. final judgment and order of the court. (Para 14)
JUDGMENT

1. The Plaintiff by its Statement of Claim dated 3 November 06 claimed for the total sum of RM1,504,241.38 together with interest and costs against the 3 Defendants in respect of goods sold and purchased for the use and/or repair of the ship known as KD SRI INDERAPURA (the Ship)

2. The goods sold and purchased comprised of inter alia , spares for circuit breakers, switchboards and other marine parts (the said Goods) that were ordered by the Second Defendant through the First Defendant vide official Purchase Orders issued to the Plaintiff.

3. It was a term of the contract that the said Goods were to be supplied and delivered by the Plaintiff to the store of the First Defendant at its Navy Base in Lumut, Perak.

4. It was also stated in the Purchase Orders that the said Go

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top