FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
HASSAN KADIR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MOHAMED MOIDU MOHAMED & ANOR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal overview. (Para 1) |
| 2. establishment of relevant facts in the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. high court proceedings and orders. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal interpretation of contractual duties. (Para 10 , 18 , 22) |
| 5. court of appeal's focus on statutory interpretation. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
| 6. recommendations on registering constructive trust. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 7. final judgment and costs. (Para 31) |
Introduction
[1] This is an appeal by the appellants against the decision of the Court of Appeal dated 1 September 2009 dismissing the appellants' appeal. Leave to appeal was granted by this Court on 19 July 2010 on the following question:
Whether the Deed of Sale and Irrevocable Power of Attorney, executed prior to the commencement of s 205 of the National Land Code 1965 , is an instrument of dealing in respect of an alienated land, within the provisions of s 205, of the National Land Code 1965 , read with ss 5 and 206 to 211 thereof; and if it is not an instrument of dealing, whether the prohibition in s 205 (3) applies to the Deed of Sale and Irrevocable Power of Attorney.
In this judgment, the respondents will be referred to as the plaintiffs an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.