CHINA ORIENT ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION vs ALEXMA CORPORATION SDN BHD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2017 MarsdenLR 282

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHINA ORIENT ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
ALEXMA CORPORATION SDN BHD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Parminder Kaur ,Respondent Advocate: Oh Teik Keng

Table of Content
1. review of appeal process and court procedures. (Para 1 , 2)
2. summary of key facts regarding amendments and ownership. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. details of applications and grounds for amendments. (Para 6 , 7)
4. court's reasoning on approval of amendments. (Para 8 , 9)

[1] This appeal from the Kuala Lumpur High Court is against the order made on 10 October 2016. The High Court had granted an application by the plaintiff there to re-amend its statement of claim. The 1st defendant, in the High Court, is dissatisfied with that decision and has now filed this appeal.

[2] The appeal was heard on 22 June 2017. After having read the written submissions as well as hearing oral arguments on the issues raised, we allowed the appeal in part. Our reasons for so doing now follow. Where convenient, the parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.

Brief History And Facts

[3] The relevant background facts leading to the filing of the amendment application are set out in the judgment of the learned judge and can be stated as follows. The plaintiff bought two pieces of land from the 2nd defendant. The 2nd defendant, however, transferred the said lands to the 1st defendant. As

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2017 MarsdenLR 282

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYACHINA ORIENT ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – AppellantVersusALEXMA CORPORATION SDN BHD – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CHINA ORIENT ASSET MANAGEMENT CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
ALEXMA CORPORATION SDN BHD – Respondent