HIGH COURT MALAYA, KUALA LUMPUR
RHB BANK BHD – Appellant
Versus
BACTRA PROPERTIES SDN BHD & ORS (NO 2) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for security for costs. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background on the defendant's financial status. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. plaintiff's claims against the defendants. (Para 13) |
| 4. legal standards for security for costs. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. balancing test for security for costs. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. discretionary nature of ordering security. (Para 21) |
[1] Enclosure 62 is the plaintiff's application for security for costs from the 1st defendant pursuant to s. 351 of the Companies Act 1965 . The plaintiff prays for the following orders:
1) that the 1st defendant pays RM250,000 as security for costs within seven days from the date of the order of the court;
2) that all proceedings in this suit is stayed pending the payment of the security for costs; and
3) in the event the security for costs is not paid the defence and counter claim dated 20 September 2010 is dismissed/struck out with no order as to cost.
[2] The application is supported by an affidavit in support affirmed on 27 October 2010.
[3] Grounds For The Application
i. The 1st defendant was wound up by an order dated 4 February 2010;
ii. The 1st defendant's liabili
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.