SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 886

HIGH COURT MALAYA SHAH ALAM
CHIEW FOONG SHUANG – Appellant
Versus
KETUA PENGARAH JABATAN PENDAFTARAN NEGARA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Pramjit Kaur ,Respondent Advocate: Nur Aifaa Che Abdullah

Table of Content
1. significance of names in legal applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. legal provisions for changing names in the bdra. (Para 21 , 32 , 39 , 74)
3. court ruling on the dismissal of the application. (Para 55 , 76)
Choong Yeow Choy JC:

Introduction

[1] "What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet." This may indeed be true when references are made to things or objects. Nevertheless, in the context of people or persons, do names merely serve the purpose of distinguishing a person from another? After all, to an individual, the sweetest sound a person hears is the person's name.

[2] A legal issue relating to the significance of a name, or more accurately, the right to pick and subsequently change one's surname and given name was raised before this court.

The Parties And The Nature Of The Applications

[3] The plaintiff is one Chiew Foong Shuang.

[4] The defendant is the Ketua Pengarah, Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara (Director General, National Registration Department).

[5] The plaintiff had commenced an Originating Summons action against the defendant to alter her child's surname and given name.

[6] The name Moo Heng-Yu was registered in the child's b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top