SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 MarsdenLR 2757

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ETIQA GENERAL TAKAFUL BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
MOHD KHAIRUL IRMAN MOHD ZIN & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Sean Denis ,Respondent Advocate: S Ganesh M Subramaniam

JUDGMENT

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad J:

[1] Before the court is an application by an insurance company under s 96(3) of the Road Transport Act 1987 for declarations that a motor insurance policy is void and unenforceable in relation to a road accident and that the insurer bears no liability for claims arising from that accident. The core issue is whether the policy, which was purchased on the same day as the accident, had come into effect at the time the accident occurred, with the evidence suggesting the policy was issued at 3:49pm while the accident took place earlier that afternoon. Central to the court's determination are questions about when insurance coverage commences when both issuance and accident occur on the same day, whether the insurer waived its rights by not making specific inquiries before issuing the policy, and whether voiding the policy would undermine the protective purpose of the .

Background Facts

[2] On 23 December 2022, a road traffic accident occurred involving a motor car bearing registration number WXE 6746 and a motorcycle bearing registration number BQU 1570. The motor car was owned by the 1st Defendant, Mohd Khairul Irman bin Mohd Zin, and was being dri

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top