SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 MarsdenLR 136

ISMAIL KHAN
BALASINGHAM – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - David Marshall; Marshall & Smith For the respondent - Harun bin Haji Idris (FC)

JUDGMENT

Ismail Khan J:

In this case the appellant was charged as follow:

That you on 8 November 1958 at about 12.50 p.m. at No. 31 Sultan Street, Kuala Lumpur, in the State of Selangor being a public servant, to wit, a Municipal Officer inspecting Deaths, did accept for yourself a valuable thing, to wit, $5 cash without consideration from Wong Yong, a person whom you knew to be concerned in business transaction by yourself, to wit, the business of issuing a death certificate in respect of the late Chew Kew Chai, and that you have thereby committed an offence punishable under s. 165 of the Penal Code.

The appellant was convicted of the offence charged and sentenced to pay a fine of $500 in default three months 'imprisonment. Against the conviction he has appealed. In his grounds of judgment the learned President says that the following "facts were proved and not denied.

(a) On 6 November 1958 a Chinese woman rubber tapper (PW2) of Sungei Choh brought her 29 days old sick baby to the General Hospital, Kuala Lumpur but the baby died before reaching the hospital.

(b) She took the dead body to the death house at No. 31 Sultan Street, Kuala Lumpur on that day,.

(c) She then made ar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top