SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 MarsdenLR 166

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
ORANGE BUSINESS SERVICES (NETWORK) SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
DEALTEL (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Bahari Yeow Tien Hong,Lim Zhi Jian ,Respondent Advocate: Ramesh Chandran,Sazarina

Table of Content
1. court affirms previous orders and addresses appeals. (Para 1 , 2)

[1] There were two appeals before us. The appeals were against three orders made by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on 19 March 2018. The orders were made in respect of a claim and counterclaim filed by the parties in the civil suit. In summary, the learned judge had:

(a) dismissed a summary judgment application by the plaintiff;

(b) ordered a stay of the plaintiff's claim pending arbitration; and

(c) ordered a stay of the defendant's counterclaim.

[2] Aggrieved with the said orders, both the plaintiff and the defendant in the High Court filed the instant appeals. After hearing the parties and taking into consideration the written submissions, we dismissed both appeals and affirmed the orders of the High Court. Our reasons for doing so now follow and will constitute the judgment of the Court. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they were in the High Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top