SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 922

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LING KHEE MING – Appellant
Versus
LING SHEW KUE @ LING CHAI YUEN & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Manian K Marappan ,Respondent Advocate: Krish Dillon

Table of Content
1. application filed for security for costs under relevant sections. (Para 1 , 4)
2. access to justice is fundamental; financial means must be considered. (Para 2 , 3)
3. limitations on the applicability of external case law. (Para 5)

[1] The respondents in this appeal has filed an application for security for costs in reliance of s 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (CJA 1964), r 27 of the Rules of of Appeal (RCA 1995) as well as O 23 of the Rules of High 2012 (ROC 2012). The application (encl 15) sets out the prayer as well as the grounds. For convenience, we inter alia repeat the application in verbatim and it read as follows:

"NOTIS USUL

(Jaminan untuk kos)

SILA AMBIL PERHATIAN bahawa pada 1 haribulan Jun, 2018 pukul 9 pagi/petang, atau dengan seberapa segera selepas itu yang dia boleh didengar, peguamcara bagi responden-responden yang dinamakan di atas akan mengusulkan Mahkamah supaya mahkamah membuat suatu perintah berdasarkan s 44 Akta Mahkamah Kehakiman 1964, k 27 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah Rayuan 1994 dan A 23 Kaedah-Kaedah Mahkamah 2012 dan untuk perintah-perintah, arahan-arahan, dan relif- relif bahawa:

1. Perayu membayar wang sebanyak RM40,000.00 atau suatu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top