INDUSTRIAL COURT SARAWAK
NORHAYATI IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court establishes criteria for misconduct in the context of employee dismissal. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 26) |
| 2. court outlines roles and functions regarding misconduct analysis. (Para 13) |
| 3. dismissal confirmed based on violation of trust and dishonesty in cash handling. (Para 33) |
[9] The function of the Industrial in s 20(3) representation as in the case is two-fold, that is, to determine:
(i) Firstly, whether the claimant's misconduct as alleged by the company has been established; and
(ii) Secondly, whether the proven misconduct of the claimant constitutes just cause or excuse for the dismissal.
[10] The company's counsel rightly cited the case of Wong Yuen Hock v. Syarikat Hong Leong Assurance Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal, 1995 MarsdenLR 1088 , where the Federal Court held as follows:
"On the authorities, we were of the view that the main and only function of the Industrial Court in dealing with a reference under s 20 of the Act (unless otherwise lawfully provided by the terms of the reference), is to determine whether the misconduct or irregularities complained of by the management as the grounds of dismissal were in fact committed by the workman, and if so, whethe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.