SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 2930

INDUSTRIAL COURT SARAWAK
NORHAYATI IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. court establishes criteria for misconduct in the context of employee dismissal. (Para 9 , 10 , 12 , 26)
2. court outlines roles and functions regarding misconduct analysis. (Para 13)
3. dismissal confirmed based on violation of trust and dishonesty in cash handling. (Para 33)
The Law

[9] The function of the Industrial in s 20(3) representation as in the case is two-fold, that is, to determine:

(i) Firstly, whether the claimant's misconduct as alleged by the company has been established; and

(ii) Secondly, whether the proven misconduct of the claimant constitutes just cause or excuse for the dismissal.

[10] The company's counsel rightly cited the case of Wong Yuen Hock v. Syarikat Hong Leong Assurance Sdn Bhd & Another Appeal, 1995 MarsdenLR 1088 , where the Federal Court held as follows:

"On the authorities, we were of the view that the main and only function of the Industrial Court in dealing with a reference under s 20 of the Act (unless otherwise lawfully provided by the terms of the reference), is to determine whether the misconduct or irregularities complained of by the management as the grounds of dismissal were in fact committed by the workman, and if so, whethe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top