JUDGMENT

Wan Muhammad Amin Wan Yahya JC:

[1] By a Notice of Application dated 13 September 2020, the 1st defendant applied for an interlocutory prohibitory injunction under O 29 of the Rules of 2012 (" ROC ") (encl 116).

[2] By a Notice of Application dated 15 September 2020 the 2nd defendant also applied for an interlocutory prohibitory injunction under O 29 ROC (encl 121) which reliefs are almost identical to that of encl 116.

[3] The subject matter of the injunctions sought in both encls 116 and 121 (collectively referred to as the "Applications") are the same and even the grounds in support of the Applications are substantially the same. In fact, when encl 116 was called up for its first Case Management on 14 September 2020, learned counsel for the 2nd defendant, Mr Kevin Prakash, informed the Court that the 2nd defendant will be filing a similar application, which it did in encl 121.

[4] Therefore, encls 116 and 121 were heard and decided together.

[5] In this regard, at the hearing of both these applications, learned counsel for the 2nd defendant adopted the submissions of learned counsel for the 1st defendant, Mr Sudhar Thillainathan, and added on to those submissions where they