COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
AMER MOHIDEEN DAWOOD – Appellant
Versus
SNEH BHAR TER BINDER SINGH – Respondent
[1] Counsel for the respondent in this appeal applies by notice of motion for the appeal to be dismissed on the ground that the appellant's appeal to the Court of Appeal is incompetent as the value of the subject-matter of the claim under appeal was less than RM250,000 and no leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal was obtained.
[2] Section 68(l)(a) of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 is as follows:
68(l)No appeal shall be brought to the Court of Appeal in any of the following cases:
(a) when the amount or value of the subject-matter of the claim (exclusive of interest) is less than two hundred and fifty thousand ringgit, except with the leave of the Court of Appeal;
[3] "The amount of the claim" has to mean the total amount or sum of the claim in the action which has been adjudged to be payable and, if it is not a money claim, it is "the value of the subject-matter of the claim" in the action which has been adjudged as recoverable because it is only against the judgment (and not against the claim made by claimants in their pleadings) that the appeal could be brought. See Allan v. Pratt [1888] 13 AC 780 . The Earl of Selborne, giving the judgment of the Privy Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.