SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 1982

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MUNAWAR AHMAD ANEES – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Manjeet Singh Dhillon ,Respondent Advocate: Eddie Yeo Soon Chye,DPP

JUDGMENT

Zulkefli Makinudin FCJ:

[1] By way of a notice of motion in encl (2a) the applicant is moving this court to invoke its power under r 137 of the Rules of the Federal 1995 ('RFC') to review and to set aside the order made by the court of Appeal on 30 October 2007 in Criminal Appeal No W-09-31-2003. The applicant is also seeking the inherent powers of this court under r 137 RFC for an order that the Kuala Lumpur High court Criminal Appeal NO 42-44-1998 be heard on its merits. This application has been dismissed. We now give our reasons.

[2] The applicant was charged at the Sessions court for an offence under s 377D of the Penal Code as follows:

Bahawa kamu, dalam bulan Mac 1993, pada sebelah malam, di NO 8, Jalan Setia Murni 1, Bukit Damansara, dalam Wilayah Persekutuan, Kuala Lumpur telah melakukan perbuatan kelucahan melampau dengan Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim dengan membenarkan Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim memasukkan zakarnya ke dalam dubur kamu dan oleh yang demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan yang boleh dihukum di bawah s 377D Kanun Keseksaan.

[3] The applicant pleaded guilty to the said charge and was convicted and sentenced on 19 September 1998 by the learned judge of th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top